Ruled against Akshay Aditya (Petitioner)
In Short
A postgraduate medical student sought anticipatory bail after facing serious charges of rape, forced physical relations, and deceitful marriage promises made by a complainant he met on Instagram. The Delhi High Court reviewed previous orders, status reports, and ongoing investigation details surrounding the allegations.
The Parties
Party A: Akshay Aditya (Petitioner)
Party B: The State of NCT of Delhi and Another (Respondents)
Advocates & Judges
For Party A: Learned Advocate Mr. Mohit Mathur, Learned Advocate Ms. Vidha Datta Makhija, Learned Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Learned Advocate Mr. Girish Kumar, Learned Advocate Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Learned Advocate Mr. Aditya Kumar, Learned Advocate Mr. Varun Kesharwani, Learned Advocate Mr. Kishlay Kumar, Learned Advocate Mr. Aman Mishra, and Learned Advocate Mr. Rajiv Dalal
For Party B: Learned Advocate Mr. Hemant Mehla, Learned Advocate Mr. Mayank Chaudhary, Learned Advocate Mr. Mohd. Naved, Learned Advocate Ms. Warisha Farasat, Learned Advocate Mr. Akash Mohan Srivastav, Learned Advocate Ms. Suvarna, and Learned Advocate Mr. Nandlal Singh
Judge(s): Hon'ble Justice Sachin Datta
What the Case Was About
The case involved a complicated dispute stemming from a relationship that began on Instagram between a postgraduate surgery student and an adult complainant. The complainant alleged that the petitioner repeatedly promised to marry her, forced her into physical relations against her will at various hotels and locations in Vaishali, New Delhi, and Patna, threatened suicide, and ultimately backed out of the marriage promise.
Judgment Date
30.10.2026
The Outcome
The judgment text provided is incomplete as it cuts off during the recounting of the status report, leaving the final outcome of the anticipatory bail application unstated in the available public record excerpt.
What the Court Looked At
- The court examined the initial FIR and subsequent additions under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- It reviewed the complainant's detailed statements and her medical examination records.
- It considered previous orders, including the transit remand refusal from Patna and the session court's dismissal of anticipatory bail.
- It took note of WhatsApp chats and social media interactions presented by the prosecution.
What This Means For You
Online relationships and unfulfilled promises can quickly entangle individuals in severe legal battles involving grave criminal charges. When personal disputes escalate into formal police complaints with allegations of forced relations and deceit, navigating the legal system becomes extremely complex and stressful. If you or someone you know is caught in a difficult legal situation involving sudden criminal allegations, Setback Solutions can help you understand your options and coordinate next steps clearly and calmly.
You Still Have Options
Dealing with an unexpected criminal case, a sudden police complaint, or a rejected bail application can make you feel completely overwhelmed and unsure of what to do next. You do not have to figure out the entire legal maze on your own, and exploring a second opinion or non-judicial guidance can provide much-needed clarity. Reach out to Setback Solutions for help understanding your options and coordinating the next step. Please remember, Setback Solutions is not a law firm, does not give legal advice, and never promises a specific court outcome.