Ruled in favour of State of U.P. & Another (Opposite party/Respondents(s))
In Short
A woman accused a police inspector of hiding his first marriage, tricking her into a relationship through a fake marriage promise, drugging and assaulting her, and blackmailing her with private photos. The accused police officer asked the court to throw out the charge-sheet and criminal case against him. The court records detail serious allegations of cheating, forced abortion, and criminal intimidation.
The Parties
Party A: Amit Kumar
Party B: State of U.P. & Kumari Mamata Sinsinwar alias Jiya
Advocates & Judges
For Party A: Learned Advocate Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Learned Advocate Ms. Renu Singh, Learned Advocate Mr. Vinod Prakash Srivastava (Senior Adv.), Learned Advocate Mr. I.K. Chaturvedi (Senior Adv.), Learned Advocate Mr. Ayush Kaushik
For Party B: Learned Advocate Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Learned A.G.A.
Judge(s): Hon'ble Justice Madan Pal Singh
What the Case Was About
An Uttar Pradesh Police Inspector named Amit Kumar was accused by a woman of approaching her family with a false marriage proposal while hiding the fact that he was already married with children. The woman alleged that he called her to a hotel in Varanasi, spiked her drink to make her unconscious, sexually assaulted her, and secretly recorded private photographs to blackmail her into continuing the relationship. She also stated that when she got pregnant, he forced her to take pills to end the pregnancy against her will. When she found out about his first wife and tried to move on, he allegedly misused his police power to track her phone, threaten her, and send abusive messages. The accused argued that the woman went with him freely, that he always intended to marry her after getting a divorce from his first wife, and that his first wife conspired with the complainant to frame him.
Judgment Date
30th September, 2026
The Outcome
The judgment text provided does not contain the final concluding order or the court's final decision on whether the application was allowed or dismissed, as the text stops mid-sentence before the final ruling.
What the Court Looked At
- The complainant stated that the accused police inspector hid his first marriage and tricked her into a relationship with a false promise of marriage.
- The complainant alleged that the accused spiked her drink at a Varanasi hotel, assaulted her while she was unconscious, and used secret photos to blackmail her.
- The complainant stated that the accused forced her to undergo an unauthorized termination of pregnancy after she conceived.
- The accused argued that the complainant traveled to Varanasi and stayed with him of her own free will without protest.
- The accused claimed he intended to marry her after his divorce and that his first wife colluded with the complainant to instigate the case.
What This Means For You
This case shows the dangerous legal and personal risks of entering into relationships built on hidden truths and false marital statuses. The accused police officer got entangled in severe criminal charges under multiple serious sections of law because of allegations involving deception, blackmail, and forced termination of pregnancy. The practical takeaway is to always verify someone's background and marital status honestly before making major life commitments, as hiding the truth can destroy lives and lead to severe criminal prosecution. Setback Solutions can help you understand your options and coordinate next steps if you or someone you know is facing a complex matrimonial dispute or criminal investigation.
You Still Have Options
If you are facing a false FIR, a complicated matrimonial fraud case, or wondering what to do after a police charge-sheet has been filed against you, remember that it is not the end of the road. You can still explore options such as seeking a second opinion, evaluating your legal representation, or getting non-judicial guidance on how to navigate the system. Reach out to Setback Solutions for help understanding your options and coordinating the next step. Please note that Setback Solutions is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or guarantee any specific outcome.